Fill in a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Form
Document Sample
HQDA#: |
Attachments Menu |
NCO EVALUATION REPORT (SGT)
For use of this form, see AR
SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
IN AR
PART I
a.NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)
b. SSN (or DOD ID No.)
c. RANK
d. DATE OF RANK
e. PMOSC
f. UNIT, ORG, STATION, ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND
g. STATUS CODE
h. UIC
i. REASON FOR SUBMISSION
j. PERIOD COVERED
FROMTHRU
YEAR MONTH DAY |
YEAR MONTH DAY |
k.RATED MONTHS
l.NONRATED CODES
m. NO OF ENCLOSURES
n. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)
PART II
a1. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)
a2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)
a3. RATER'S SIGNATURE
a4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)
a5. RANK |
PMOSC/BRANCH |
ORGANIZATION |
DUTY ASSIGNMENT
a6. RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)
b1. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)
b2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)
b3. SENIOR RATER'S SIGNATURE
b4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)
b5. RANK |
PMOSC/BRANCH |
ORGANIZATION |
DUTY ASSIGNMENT |
b6. SENIOR RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)
c1. SUPPLEMENTARY |
c2. NAME OF SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER |
c3. RANK |
PMOSC/ |
ORGANIZATION |
DUTY ASSIGNMENT |
|||
REVIEW REQUIRED? |
(Last, First, Middle Initial) |
|
|
BRANCH |
|
|
|
|
YES |
NO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
c4. COMMENTS |
|
c5. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE |
c6. DATE(YYYYMMDD) |
|
c7. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS |
|||
ENCLOSED? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.gov or .mil) |
|
YES |
NO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the assessments of the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data in Part I, the rating officials and counseling dates in Part II, the duty description in Part III, and the APFT and height/weight entries in Part IVa and IVb are correct. I have seen the completed report. I am aware of the appeals process of AR
d1. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL
LATER
LATER
LATER
d2. RATED NCO'S SIGNATURE
d3. DATE (YYYYMMDD)
PART III
a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE
b. DUTY MOSC
c.DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities, and dollars)
d.AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS
e.APPOINTED DUTIES
PART IV
a. APFT Pass/Fail/Profile: |
Date: |
b. Height: |
Weight: |
Within Standard? |
(Comments required for "Failed" APFT, "No" APFT, or "Profile" when it precludes performance of duty, and "No" for Army Weight Standards.) Reset Item a. APFT/Pass/Fail/Profile
c.CHARACTER: (Include bullet comments addressing Rated NCO's performance as it relates to adherence to Army Values, Empathy, Warrior Ethos/Service Ethos, and Discipline. Fully supports SHARP, EO, and EEO.)
MET |
DID NOT MEET |
STANDARD |
STANDARD |
COMMENTS:
DA FORM |
Page 1 of 2 |
APD LC v1.00ES
RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial) |
SSN (or DOD ID No.) |
THRU DATE |
|
|
|
PART IV
d. PRESENCE: (Military and professional |
COMMENTS: |
|
bearing, Fitness, Confidence, Resilience.) |
|
|
MET |
DID NOT MEET |
|
STANDARD |
STANDARD |
|
e. INTELLECT: (Mental agility, Sound judgment, COMMENTS: |
|
Innovation, Interpersonal tact, Expertise.) |
|
MET |
DID NOT MEET |
STANDARD |
STANDARD |
f. LEADS: (Leads others, Builds trust, Extends COMMENTS: |
|
influence beyond the chain of command, Leads by |
|
example Communicates.) |
|
MET |
DID NOT MEET |
STANDARD |
STANDARD |
g. DEVELOPS: (Creates a positive command/ COMMENTS: |
|
workplace environment, Fosters esprit de corps, |
|
Prepares self, Develops others, Stewards the |
|
profession.) |
|
MET |
DID NOT MEET |
STANDARD |
STANDARD |
|
|
h. ACHIEVES: (Gets results.) |
COMMENTS: |
MET |
DID NOT MEET |
STANDARD |
STANDARD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RATER OVERALL PERFORMANCE |
|
i. I currently rate |
NCOs in this grade. |
|
|||||
COMMENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART V |
|
a. Select one box representing Rated |
b. COMMENTS: |
|
|||||
NCO’s potential compared to others in the |
|
|
|||||
same grade whom you have rated in your |
|
|
|||||
career. I currently senior rate |
|
|
|||||
NCOs in this grade. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
MOST QUALIFIED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HIGHLY QUALIFIED |
|
|
|||||
QUALIFIED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOT QUALIFIED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
c. List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment |
|
||||||
Successive Assignment: |
1) |
|
|
2) |
Broadening Assignment: |
||
|
|
|
|||||
DA FORM |
|
Page 2 of 2 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APD PE v1.00ES |
Document Information
| Fact Name | Description |
|---|---|
| Form Purpose | The DA 2166-9-1 form is used to evaluate the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) at the rank of Sergeant. |
| Governing Regulations | This form is governed by Army Regulation (AR) 623-3 and DA Pamphlet 623-3. |
| Privacy Statement | A Privacy Act Statement is included in AR 623-3, ensuring the protection of personal information. |
| Administrative Data | Part I of the form collects essential administrative data, including the NCO's name, SSN, rank, and unit information. |
| Rater's Role | The rater must provide their name, signature, and evaluation of the rated NCO's performance. |
| Performance Evaluation | Part IV assesses various attributes, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. |
| Submission Requirements | The form requires the rated NCO's acknowledgment of understanding regarding their performance evaluation and the appeals process. |
Da 2166 9 1 - Usage Guidelines
Completing the DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential process for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs). This form requires accurate and thorough input of personal and performance-related information. Following these steps will ensure that the form is filled out correctly.
- Part I - Administrative Data:
- Enter the rated NCO's name (Last, First, Middle Initial).
- Provide the Social Security Number (SSN) or DOD ID Number.
- Indicate the NCO's rank.
- Fill in the date of rank.
- Input the Primary Military Occupational Specialty Code (PMOSC).
- List the unit, organization, station, ZIP code or APO, and major command.
- Specify the status code.
- Provide the Unit Identification Code (UIC).
- State the reason for submission.
- Enter the period covered, including start and end dates.
- Indicate the rated months.
- Provide non-rated codes.
- List the number of enclosures.
- Enter the rated NCO's email address (.gov or .mil).
- Part II - Authentication:
- Enter the name of the rater (Last, First, Middle Initial).
- Provide the rater's SSN or DOD ID Number.
- The rater must sign and date the form.
- Indicate the rater's rank, PMOSC/branch, and organization duty assignment.
- Provide the rater's email address (.gov or .mil).
- Repeat similar steps for the senior rater, including name, SSN, signature, date, rank, and email address.
- If applicable, fill in supplementary reviewer information and comments.
- Part III - Duty Description:
- Enter the principal duty title.
- Provide the duty MOSC.
- Describe daily duties and scope, including people, equipment, facilities, and financial responsibilities.
- List areas of special emphasis.
- Include appointed duties.
- Part IV - Performance Evaluation:
- Record the APFT results, including pass/fail/profile status and date.
- Provide height and weight, noting if within standards.
- Fill out performance evaluation sections for character, presence, intellect, leads, develops, and achieves, with comments for each.
- Indicate overall performance rating.
- Part V - Senior Rater Overall Potential:
- Select a box representing the rated NCO's potential compared to others in the same grade.
- Provide comments on potential.
- List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment.
After completing the form, review all entries for accuracy. Ensure that all required signatures are obtained before submission. This form plays a crucial role in the evaluation process, impacting career progression and development opportunities for the NCO.
Common PDF Forms
Hurt Feelings Report - Provides a foundation for individuals to express vulnerabilities.
A Colorado Medical Power of Attorney form is a legal document that allows an individual to designate someone else to make medical decisions on their behalf if they become unable to do so. This important tool ensures that a person's healthcare preferences are honored, even when they cannot communicate them. For those interested in obtaining this form, resources like Colorado PDF Templates can provide valuable assistance in navigating the process. Understanding how to properly complete and utilize this form is essential for anyone looking to safeguard their medical choices.
How to Get Proof of Dog Vaccinations - Always consult with your veterinarian regarding the latest vaccination recommendations.
Dos and Don'ts
When filling out the DA 2166 9 1 form, it's essential to be thorough and accurate. Here are some important do's and don'ts to keep in mind:
- Do double-check all personal information for accuracy, including your name, SSN, and rank.
- Do ensure that the dates, especially the date of rank and period covered, are correct.
- Do provide a clear and detailed description of your duties and responsibilities in Part III.
- Do use your official email address (.gov or .mil) for all sections requiring an email.
- Don't leave any required fields blank; all sections must be completed to avoid delays.
- Don't forget to sign and date the form in the appropriate sections, as your signature is crucial for validation.
- Don't submit the form without reviewing it for spelling errors or inconsistencies.
Following these guidelines can help ensure that your evaluation report is processed smoothly and accurately. Remember, attention to detail is key.
Common mistakes
-
Incomplete Administrative Data: Failing to fill out all required fields in Part I, such as the name, SSN, or unit information, can lead to delays or rejections of the evaluation report.
-
Incorrect Dates: Entering the wrong dates for the period covered or counseling dates can cause confusion regarding the evaluation timeframe.
-
Missing Signatures: Not obtaining the required signatures from the rater, senior rater, or supplementary reviewer can render the form invalid.
-
Omitting Required Comments: Failing to provide comments in performance evaluation sections, especially for "Did Not Meet Standard" ratings, can lead to a lack of clarity in the evaluation.
-
Inaccurate Email Addresses: Providing incorrect email addresses for the rater or senior rater can hinder communication and follow-up regarding the evaluation.
-
Neglecting to Verify Information: Not reviewing the completed form for accuracy before submission can result in errors that impact the rated NCO's career.